Verification policy

Be clear about what has actually been checked.

A link checked against an official website is not the same as a verified person, an endorsed provider, or a confirmed business result. AccelerateLink keeps those meanings separate.

Read the editorial policy

Source review

A source-backed resource identifies the official provider and records when information was reviewed. A last-verified date describes that editorial check, not a guarantee that terms, deadlines, or availability remain unchanged. Confirm current details with the provider before acting.

Identity and professional credentials

This public release does not perform identity, background, professional credential, or investment verification. No user has earned a verified identity or professional badge through this build. Inclusion in a directory is not endorsement.

Examples and reported outcomes

Product demonstration scores, matches, profiles, and outcome examples are labeled as illustrative. They are not real user claims. A future self-reported outcome must be identified as such, while a verified result would require a defined scope, evidence, review date, and participant permission.

Corrections and future review standards

A production verification service must specify what was checked, by whom or by what process, when the check expires, and how a correction or appeal is handled. Those operational services are not currently active. The contact page displays the available route for reporting editorial issues when configured.

Questions, answered.

Does a match score prove a provider is trustworthy?

No. It describes illustrative criteria alignment in this release. Trust, credentials, terms, and suitability require independent checks.