Publish a program people can self-qualify for
Explain the target stage, geography, sector focus, commitment, selection process, and what support is actually included. Put terms and eligibility beside the application link. Avoid making applicants work through a full form to discover a disqualifying requirement.
Use a consistent intake and a tailored route
A shared intake can identify customer evidence, product maturity, team constraints, and current objectives. Mentors can then be allocated to specific gaps. Treat intake scores as prompts for discussion and review, not an automatic admission decision.
- Define scoring guidance before reviewing applications.
- Record reasons and outstanding questions.
- Give each accepted team a milestone and support owner.
- Review follow-through after the session or workshop.
Report outcomes with context
Separate applications, attendance, completed actions, customer milestones, and reported business results. Record the cohort period and denominator for every aggregate. Program administration, hosted applications, and cohort dashboards are planned capabilities; this release demonstrates their structure.
Questions, answered.
Can we manage a live cohort here?
Not in this public release. It provides the product workflow, planning resources, and source-backed program discovery, without hosted cohort administration.
Will AccelerateScore select applicants for us?
No. The score is a self-assessment aid. Admissions need contextual review and a process suited to the program.